This Page

has been moved to new address

Awaiting the Empire's Ain Jalut

Sorry for inconvenience...

Redirection provided by Blogger to WordPress Migration Service
various rambling thoughts: Awaiting the Empire's Ain Jalut

Friday, October 13, 2006

Awaiting the Empire's Ain Jalut

Battle of Ain Jalut on September 3, 1260 was a turning point in the history of the Mongol empire and by extension in the history of the world, a war which effectively drew the boundary of a ruthless empire on the roll and from where on, the only place where the empire could go was inward and back, which marked the end of the aura of invincibility of the Mongol warrior, the first time that they were effectively destroyed and comprehensively defeated in battle.


The Mongols had sacked and brutally depopulated Baghdad in 1258 , a blow from which the country (now Iraq) never really recovered from, and had marched on to Egypt where the Mamluks ruled. The horror of Baghdad had hardened Muslim resolve in Egypt and elsewhere in the Islamic world (especially when Damascus surrendered without a fight). And then at Ain Jalut, came the turning point when a motivated army of people with nothing to lose defeated an Imperial army that was fed on too many stories of its own superiority and invincibility.


All this is old hat, an history lesson, but then history is never as remote as many of us think even when the events talked about are almost a millennium old.


This is precisely the sentiment effectively echoed by Amir Butler in this article “Mongol Invasion of Iraq: Lessons never learned” . The Mongols made human pyramids of humans to exhibit their ferocity and their strength and their superiority. The American soldiers did something similar at Abu Gharib. And the similarities do not end there, starting from the basic premise of a fledgling empire to the tactics involved in subduing a population.


And as far as history tells us, every empire meets its Ain Jalut sooner or later. The world today awaits the next one.

4 Comments:

At 2:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am currently writing a book on the Conquest of Baghdad and the Mongol invasions of the Middle East. I would say that the battle of Ain Jalut was certainly not seen as a turning point by either side (the Mongol army which was defeated was very small by Mongol standards, only about 12 000). It would be followed by 40+ years of more war, and the Mongols would come much closer at winning later on. The articles you link to have incorrect information, and hopefully when my book comes out, it will help to set the record straight.

 
At 1:39 PM, Blogger Protik Basu said...

what you say might be true, since i am only just starting out on reading on this period, i have just taken the most publicly available sources...but what i do know is that there are numerous interpretations on virtually every period of history, especially the controversial ones...

but why i wrote this article is because, important or not as it might have seemed to each side at that time, what the battle effectively meant was that the mongol expansion, a veritable juggernaut till then, was checked. it never expanded further.

Ain jalut might not been the factor but it certainly symbolized that, cuz this was the only defeat the mongols could never avenge

so it mit not have been a stalingrad but it achieved the same result, the mongol empire had reached its pinnacle.

the 40+ years of war was marked by internal warfare and the absorption of mongols in the culture of the conquered people, as it happened in china and later in india.

that was my intention of revoking Ain jalut for the juggernaut of an empire we see today.

and i wd love to know when yr book comes out...since u are an authority on the subject, it would be certainly be adding a good deal to my knowledge

 
At 3:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm rather repulsed by your comparison of the Mongol's pyramids of skulls to "The American soldiers did something similar at Abu Gharib." A small unit of ill-disciplined troops commit a photographic atrocity, and you equate it with the 200,000 civilians slaughtered deliberatly? This criticism is silly. Would the Mongols have endured the IED's if they had the power to eliminate opposition with a launch code?

 
At 12:54 PM, Blogger Protik Basu said...

i understand yr sentiments but perhaps what u sd also realize is that abu-gharib was not an isolated incident...it was just that it came to light when others didnt, something like My Lai...there were thousands of My Lai's in vietnam but people only remember that because an american soldier named hugh thomson took a stand...

and why i compare mongols to americans? because of the sheer arrogance of power and the way a people of another culture are considered beneath contempt...an apt description of the american military right from the days of the invasion of mexico and stealing of california from them....

 

Post a Comment

<< Home